why did European foresters regarding shifting cultivation harmful for the forests.?
.
.
.
.
15 marks yaar.! Don't miss it.
And perfect answer will be marked as brainliest for sure
Answers
Answered by
0
HEY _______________MATE
(･ิω･ิ)(･ิω･ิ)(･ิω･ิ)(･ิω･ิ)(･ิω･ิ)(･ิω･ิ)
⤵⤵⤵⤵⤵⤵⤵⤵⤵⤵⤵
ANS: European foresters regarded shifting cultivation harmful for forestsbecause they felt that the land which was used for cultivation every few years could not grow trees for railway timber. Besides, the burning of trees may result in spreading of fire into theforest destroying valuable timber.
(･ิω･ิ)(･ิω･ิ)(･ิω･ิ)(･ิω･ิ)(･ิω･ิ)(･ิω･ิ)
⤵⤵⤵⤵⤵⤵⤵⤵⤵⤵⤵
ANS: European foresters regarded shifting cultivation harmful for forestsbecause they felt that the land which was used for cultivation every few years could not grow trees for railway timber. Besides, the burning of trees may result in spreading of fire into theforest destroying valuable timber.
Answered by
1
hey mate here is your answer
European foresters regardedshifting cultivation harmfulfor forests because :
• they felt that the land which was used for cultivation every few years could not grow trees for railway timber.
•Besides, the burning of trees may result in spreading of fire into theforest destroying valuable timber.
•shifting cultivation also made it harder for the government to calculate taxes.
• when a forest was burn there was a added danger of flames burning and spreading.
HOPE IT HELPS YOU
PLZ MARK AS BRAINLIEST
European foresters regardedshifting cultivation harmfulfor forests because :
• they felt that the land which was used for cultivation every few years could not grow trees for railway timber.
•Besides, the burning of trees may result in spreading of fire into theforest destroying valuable timber.
•shifting cultivation also made it harder for the government to calculate taxes.
• when a forest was burn there was a added danger of flames burning and spreading.
HOPE IT HELPS YOU
PLZ MARK AS BRAINLIEST
Similar questions