Why did farmers struggle in the years after the Civil War?
Answers
Answered by
0
When South Carolina troops fired upon Fort Sumter in April of 1861, America's long struggle over slavery and sectionalism finally erupted into open conflict. Over the ensuing four years, as war tore the nation apart, people of all walks of life attempted to adjust to a nation changed by war. Farmers in the Midwest, or the Northwest as it was known then, also faced major adjustments to their ways of life. While the seat of the war never drifted into Iowa, Illinois, or other Midwestern states, these areas faced such factors as larger percentages of their populations serving in the military and a corresponding lack of manpower to do field work, the increased use of horse-drawn implements to increase the efficiency of farm production, and the emergence of a more commercial manner of farming. In facing these issues and others, people far away from the battlefield dealt with a nation at war.
The largest issue that faced farmers during the war was the lack of manpower available to work the land due to military enlistments. While not every male eligible to serve enlisted, many states saw a sizeable portion of that population go to war. For example, forty-nine percent of Iowa's male population of military age served in the Union Army, the highest percentage of any Northern state. Of all the men that served in the Union Army, forty-eight percent were farmers. With this large body of farmers and farm laborers unavailable to work, those left sought ways to maintain their farm operations in a profitable manner. The wages that laborers demanded rose as the number of men remaining in an area dropped. To deal with this, families struggled to continue the work that fathers, husbands, and sons left them. Boys took greater responsibility on the farm, lacking the knowledge of farming that fathers and older brothers had earned after years of agrarian employment. These sons learned by trial and error, or by advice and instruction found in letters written from the front. In some cases, women took to the fields to make sure that work was done and that the farm survived.
In response to the demands for labor and labor-saving devices, farmers quickened the pace of the adaptation of new technologies for use on the farm. Chief among these were machines designed for harvesting crops such as hay, wheat, and other cereal grains. Rather than trying to harvest crops by hand, a process that might take days, farmers made the financial investment in devices that allowed them to work faster. These devices in turn allowed for farmers to increase the size of the crop in question because of the efficiency they added meant faster harvests of larger fields. During this time of technological expansion, manufacturers changed the way that they marketed their goods. Rather than telling potential customers how many machines had been sold or other information, images within the ads showed women operating machines, demonstrating their ease of use for those women in charge of field work while men were off to war. Other ads showed crippled veterans, most noticeably missing one arm, operating mowers or reapers. Those who returned maimed would still be able to farm due to modern technology.
The Civil War also helped to push Midwestern farmers closer to a more commercial model of agriculture. As with any war, troops need to be fed, clothed, and their supplies moved from place to place; farmers supplied the army with horses, pork, beef, and wool for uniforms. The price of wool skyrocketed when the demand for new uniforms drove the market. The army needed to eat, and farmers rushed to fill contracts for pork and beef with meat packers. The investment in a few extra animals in the short run provided farmers a hedge against hard times and a cash income through the commercial marketing of animals for the war effort.
Major conflict never arose in the Midwest itself during the Civil War, but those who did not serve in the military still dealt with its effects. The war years acted as a catalyst for change in agriculture. As a result of the shifting demands of the markets, as well as the short supply of labor available, farmers changed how they operated their farms, and opened the way for major changes in farming during the second half of the nineteenth century.
Robert C. Welch
The largest issue that faced farmers during the war was the lack of manpower available to work the land due to military enlistments. While not every male eligible to serve enlisted, many states saw a sizeable portion of that population go to war. For example, forty-nine percent of Iowa's male population of military age served in the Union Army, the highest percentage of any Northern state. Of all the men that served in the Union Army, forty-eight percent were farmers. With this large body of farmers and farm laborers unavailable to work, those left sought ways to maintain their farm operations in a profitable manner. The wages that laborers demanded rose as the number of men remaining in an area dropped. To deal with this, families struggled to continue the work that fathers, husbands, and sons left them. Boys took greater responsibility on the farm, lacking the knowledge of farming that fathers and older brothers had earned after years of agrarian employment. These sons learned by trial and error, or by advice and instruction found in letters written from the front. In some cases, women took to the fields to make sure that work was done and that the farm survived.
In response to the demands for labor and labor-saving devices, farmers quickened the pace of the adaptation of new technologies for use on the farm. Chief among these were machines designed for harvesting crops such as hay, wheat, and other cereal grains. Rather than trying to harvest crops by hand, a process that might take days, farmers made the financial investment in devices that allowed them to work faster. These devices in turn allowed for farmers to increase the size of the crop in question because of the efficiency they added meant faster harvests of larger fields. During this time of technological expansion, manufacturers changed the way that they marketed their goods. Rather than telling potential customers how many machines had been sold or other information, images within the ads showed women operating machines, demonstrating their ease of use for those women in charge of field work while men were off to war. Other ads showed crippled veterans, most noticeably missing one arm, operating mowers or reapers. Those who returned maimed would still be able to farm due to modern technology.
The Civil War also helped to push Midwestern farmers closer to a more commercial model of agriculture. As with any war, troops need to be fed, clothed, and their supplies moved from place to place; farmers supplied the army with horses, pork, beef, and wool for uniforms. The price of wool skyrocketed when the demand for new uniforms drove the market. The army needed to eat, and farmers rushed to fill contracts for pork and beef with meat packers. The investment in a few extra animals in the short run provided farmers a hedge against hard times and a cash income through the commercial marketing of animals for the war effort.
Major conflict never arose in the Midwest itself during the Civil War, but those who did not serve in the military still dealt with its effects. The war years acted as a catalyst for change in agriculture. As a result of the shifting demands of the markets, as well as the short supply of labor available, farmers changed how they operated their farms, and opened the way for major changes in farming during the second half of the nineteenth century.
Robert C. Welch
Similar questions