Why did general grant and Sherman use a total war strategy and how did that strategy contribute to the end of the war
Answers
Answer:
Grant and Sherman used the strategy of total war to shorten the war in their favor, using the many deaths of enemies to save live on their side. We way never know if more would have died if they didn't use the tactic, but in my opinion civilian lives were not theirs to take. Soldiers agree to die,but civilians didn't, make total war, in my opinion not right. Other may say that their lives were a necessary sacrifice towards a common goal, but, in my opinion, if one side uses total war, cannot the others side use it too for a horrible end? From your own opinion, but that is mine...
Answer:
Utilizing the numerous enemy losses to preserve life on their side, Grant and Sherman adopted the total war plan to shorten the conflict in their advantage. However, in my perspective, civilian lives were not theirs to take, even though we will never know if more people would have perished if they hadn't used the approach.
Explanation:
- Total war is a strategy where militaries employ whatever tactics are necessary to win, even if they are morally or ethically repugnant in the context of war. The objective is to completely destroy the enemy and sap their will to fight so that they are unable to recover.
- Grant was aware that the Union would need to sap the Southerners' resolve to fight in order to prevail. Sherman was given the directive to destroy everything in his way. It would come to be known as the first instance of "total war" in the future. Sherman captured Atlanta in September and set fire to many of the city's structures as well as the military equipment.
#SPJ3