why did lencho say a plague of locustswould have left more than this
Answers
Lencho said that a plague of locust would have let more than this because when the hail stones were destroying the crop of Lencho. It was a great damage to his crop not even a single leaf left on any plant of the field on comparing to this lencho said that a plague of locusts would come at his field it would also save more than what was done by the hail stones.
Answer:
Lencho said that a plague of locusts would have left more than this because the hailstorms destroyed everything, not a single small leaf was left behind, and nothing was saved.
Explanation:
When Lencho said that a plague of locusts would have left more than this, he meant that the hailstorms have caused so much destruction that his field is completely ruined due to it. He worked hard for the whole year but all his difficulties went in vain. The plague means the insects that eat crops would not have caused so much destruction and a bad outcome as in this condition.
Lencho said that a plague of locusts which means an invasion which is caused by insects is a better condition than this because the insects leave behind at least something but the hailstones didn't leave anything. Everything was completely vanished. The crops were totally destroyed due to the hailstorms. Not even a single crop was left. A very few crops were also unable to be gained. The plague of locusts would have left some or the other thing. There was a lot of damage due to the hailstorms.