Social Sciences, asked by ruchigoyal1011p9dhjx, 2 months ago

. Why did Non-Cooperation Movement gradually
slow down in cities? Explain 5 reasons.​

Answers

Answered by maitri1006
1

Answer:

Khadi cloth was often more expensive than mill cloth. Poor people could not afford to buy Khadi cloth. Boycott of British institutions also posed a problem. Alternative Indian institutions were not set up.


dhammajyothivoja27: just stop
maitri1006: I M TOO GETTING THE NOTIFICATIONS
ruchigoyal1011p9dhjx: i have 2 girl friendd
ruchigoyal1011p9dhjx: and so many friends
maitri1006: THEN?
maitri1006: WHAT DO I DO?
ruchigoyal1011p9dhjx: fuk you
maitri1006: shut up
maitri1006: i will tell to my father nd u will be under bars
maitri1006: bcoz my father is IAS officer
Answered by dhammajyothivoja27
1

Answer:

Here is the answer for your question:

The non-cooperation movement slowed down in cities because:

1)Khadi cloth was often more expensive than mass-produced mill cloth and poor people could not afford to buy it. So people could not boycott mill cloth for very long.

2)Similarly boycotting British institutions also posed a problem as there were no alternative national institutions to fulfil the educational needs.

3)The students and teachers trickled to government schools. The lawyers joined government courts. With all these, the enthusiasm of people in the cities lost its force.

4)People could not boycott mill clothes for long because they could not afford Khadi clothes, Khadi was much expensive compared to mill clothes.

5)People couldn't boycott British institutions completely because there were very less or no Indian institutions where they could work or study.

6)Even if there were some Indian institutions, they were slow to come up. It was too less to take in the enormous number of people in British institutions.

Explanation:

Hope it's helpful to you .........

Similar questions