Question

why did the constituent assembly adopt the parliamentary form of government in India?

Answer 1

It is because
1.pesidential form gives power to a single person but parliament form of government gives power to many hands.
2.In persidential form the executive is not answerable to legislature whereas parliamentry form the executive is answerable ti legislative.

Answer 2

$\huge{ \mathbb{⫷❥{\red{A᭄}}}}{\green{n}}{\mathbb{\blue{s}}} {\purple{w}} {\mathbb {\orange{e}}}{\pink{r}}⫸$

$\implies$The Parliamentary form of government was chosen in India because:

1. In Parliamentary form of government ,the Executive is a part of the Legislature so there are less chances of conflict.

2. The harmonious relationship between the legislature and the executive ensures efficiency in Parliamentary form of government.

3. Parliamentary form of government ensures more responsibility of the Cabinet to the people.

4. Parliamentary form of government is more elastic and flexible than Presidential form of government.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

$\huge{\red{ᎻᎧᎮᏋ\: ᶦƬ \:Helpร}}$

$\huge{\boxed{\fcolorbox{black}{pink}{100Tђαήks=iภbøאָ}}}$

$\huge{\underline{\mathbb{\blue{קleสseﾂ}}}}\:{\green{thคήks}}\:{\orange{⦇էօօ⦈}}$

$\huge{\underline{\mathbb{\red{爪ℽ}}}}\:{\purple{❺\:Anຮwerຮ}}$

$\huge{\underline{\mathbb{\red{⪨OŇLY⪩}}}}$

$\huge{\underline{\red{ƑØℓℓõw}}}\:{\blue{ᙢě}}$