why did the new technology not entirely replace the existing art of producing books by hands ? ( answer in 3 marks ).
babajiii:
fast give answer.
Answers
Answered by
1
Technology can be very useful and life-changing. But they cannot replace the books and libraries. The main reason for this is that not all technology and gadgets are perfect. Some gadgets may have glitches or bugs, but we do not know when we use.
However books do not necessarily have errors. And books are much healthier than the growing tech. Phones can be useful again, but they can harm the eyes. As for the books and paper, they do not harm the eyes that much.
So I conclude that with the growing technology, books are also present.
However books do not necessarily have errors. And books are much healthier than the growing tech. Phones can be useful again, but they can harm the eyes. As for the books and paper, they do not harm the eyes that much.
So I conclude that with the growing technology, books are also present.
Similar questions