Question

Why didn't the poet go near the boy to console him?

Answer 1

${\huge{\redorange{\boxed{\orangered{\overline{\orangered{\underline{\emerald{\mathcal{ANSWER}}}}}}}$

The poet did not console the boy for two reasons-

• The boy was too shocked and grief-stricken to listen to any one.

• The poet also observed that the boy was trying to stand up or bear the loss on his own through self-understanding which is much more reflective and lasting.

The poet's or anybody else's consoling would not be that affective.

Mark it as brainliest.

Answer 2

Answer:

The poet did not console the boy for two reasons—One, the boy was too shocked and grief-stricken to listen to any sense. Second, the poet also observed that the boy was trying to stand up or bear the loss on his own through self-understanding which is much more reflective and lasting. The poet’s or anybody else’s consoling would not be that effective.