Political Science, asked by smarty131, 1 year ago

why do even democratic governments have some restrictions on the media? explain with an example


smarty131: if anyone is having brain so answer this question
Anonymous: However an example of an advertisement would be of any soap or washing powder.It is shown in the televisions because the producer or the company wants profit rather than losses this may be a reason.

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
31
There are some countries having restrictions in media because they want to hide what they are doing in their offices(eg. Corruption) they don't want the people to know and reject them this is why the medias are rejecting or having restrictions even in a Democratic country.

smarty131: Nice
Anonymous: Thanks
smarty131: give an example of a advertisement that you see on television why is it shown on TV
Anonymous: ???
smarty131: answer this
Anonymous: For further doubts and question message me rather than lengthening the comment box .... Move to the message box...
Anonymous: #Smarty1311
smarty131: ok
Answered by hussainkaukawala01
2

Answer:

Around the world, social media is making it easier for people to have a voice in government — to discuss issues, organize around causes, and hold leaders accountable. As recently as 2011, when social media played a critical role in the Arab Spring in places like Tunisia, it was heralded as a technology for liberation.

A lot has changed since then. The 2016 US presidential election brought to the fore the risks of foreign meddling, “fake news” and political polarization. The effect of social media on politics has never been so crucial to examine.

All of this raises an important question: what effect does social media have on democracy?

As the product manager in charge of civic engagement on Facebook, I live and breathe these issues. And while I’m an optimist at heart, I’m not blind to the damage that the internet can do to even a well-functioning democracy.

That’s why I’m dedicated to understanding these risks and ensuring the good far overshadows the bad.

With each passing year, this challenge becomes more urgent. Facebook was originally designed to connect friends and family — and it has excelled at that. But as unprecedented numbers of people channel their political energy through this medium, it’s being used in unforeseen ways with societal repercussions that were never anticipated.

In 2016, we at Facebook were far too slow to recognize how bad actors were abusing our platform. We’re working diligently to neutralize these risks now.

We can’t do this alone, which is why we want to initiate an open conversation on the hard questions this work raises. In this post, I’ll share how we are thinking about confronting the most consequential downsides of social media on democracy, and also discuss how we’re working to amplify the positive ways it can strengthen democracy, too.

Similar questions