why do Greenpeace and other environment organisation no longer support biofuels?
Answers
Answer:
Powering cars with corn and burning wood to make electricity might seem like a way to lessen dependence on fossil fuels and help solve the climate crisis. But although some forms of bioenergy can play a helpful role, dedicating land specifically for generating bioenergy is unwise. It uses land needed for food production and carbon storage, it requires large areas to generate just a small amount of fuel, and it won’t typically cut greenhouse gas emissions.
First, dedicating areas to bioenergy production increases competition for land.
Roughly three-quarters of the world’s vegetated land is already being used to meet people’s need for food and forest products, and that demand is expected to rise by 70% or more by 2050. Much of the rest contains natural ecosystems that keep climate-warming carbon out of the atmosphere, protect freshwater supplies, and preserve biodiversity.
Are biofuels worse than fossil fuels?
Read more
Because land and the plants growing on it are already generating these benefits, diverting land – even degraded, under-utilised areas – to bioenergy means sacrificing much-needed food, timber, and carbon storage.
hope it helps
mark me as brainliest
According to these researchers, production of biofuel actually contributes to global warming, doing more harm than good. It goes into the air as carbon dioxide and contributes to global warming." "Any biofuel that causes the clearing of natural ecosystems will increase global warming," he continued.
HOPE IT HELPS
PLEASE MAKE ME BRAINLIEST ☺️