English, asked by VIDITA, 1 year ago

why do people corporate and why do people not corporate give two points of each??
It's very important question give me answer and earn 10 points
Plzzzzzzzzzzzz

Answers

Answered by legendarysumit
4
corporations between people
corporations of peoples basically needed to born a relationship between two peoples because that may help us in the upcoming future

No corporations between people
some people no Corporation needed because there are such peoples justice people are there which have no values of them

mrk brainliest and follow me for any sort of help

VIDITA: plzzzz
legendarysumit: no u follow
VIDITA: plz you follow
VIDITA: me
legendarysumit: yes
VIDITA: ya
VIDITA: I write this question again now you will give me correct answer ok
Answered by Anonymous
0

Explanation:

by Vincent S. Flowers and Charles L. Hughes

From the July 1973 Issue

Many companies spend a great amount of time money investigating the causes of employee turnover—for example, through programs of exit interviews. Usually the intent behind such studies is to find out why people leave—the idea being that if a company can identify the reasons for terminations, it can work to hold terminations, and turnover, down.

While a company may obtain very valuable information from termination interviews, this kind of approach has two signal defects:

1. It looks at only one side of the coin—the termination side. If a company wants to keep its employees, then it should also study the reasons for retention and continuation, and work to reinforce these. From the viewpoint of a company’s policies on employment and turnover, the reasons why people stay in their jobs are just as important as the reasons why they leave them. An obvious point in evidence is that one individual will stay in a job under conditions that would cause another to start pounding the pavements.

As an analogy, consider the divorce rate. If one were really interested in doing something about it, he would have to understand why some people get divorced and why others stay married—the reasons for the two things are entirely different. Furthermore, the reasons for getting a divorce are not merely “just the opposite” of the reasons for staying in wedlock. He would have to do some real spadework on both sides of the fence to get a complete picture of the divorce phenomenon. Equally, in the corporate setting, there are definite rationales for terminating and definite (although sometimes unconscious) rationales for continuing.

Similar questions