Question

why do you think if Hyderabad stayed independent would have post a threat to the national unity of India?​

Answer 1

Answer:

At the time of Partition in 1947, the princely states of India, who in principle had self-government within their own territories, were subject to subsidiary alliances with the British, giving them control of their external relations. In the Indian Independence Act 1947 the British abandoned all such alliances, leaving the states with the option of opting for full independence.[12][13] However, by 1948 almost all had acceded to either India or Pakistan. One major exception was that of the wealthiest and most powerful principality, Hyderabad, where the Nizam, Mir Sir Osman Ali Khan, Asaf Jah VII, a Muslim ruler who presided over a largely Hindu population, chose independence and hoped to maintain this with an irregular army recruited from the Muslim aristocracy, known as the Razakars.[14]:224 The Nizam was also beset by the Telangana uprising, which he was unable to subjugate.[14]:224

In November 1947, Hyderabad signed a standstill agreement with the dominion of India, continuing all previous arrangements except for the stationing of Indian troops in the state. Fearing the establishment of a Communist state in Hyderabad[15] and the rise of militant Razakars, India invaded the state in September of 1948 following a crippling economic blockade.[16][3] Subsequently, the Nizam signed an instrument of accession, joining India.[17]