Social Sciences, asked by sangamhowladar01898, 8 months ago

why do you think that prime minister is authority of supreme power​

Answers

Answered by harsh4868
2

Answer:

No is right for Indian prime minister

Answered by jayaramgella
1

Answer:

Evolution.

Humans were always born free. Find your own food, find your own mate, eat, reproduce, eat, reproduce, die.

But obviously there arose conflicts while competing for food and mate. They began settling down, farming, "socializing". Some were ambitious enough to lead their civilizations, some even more ambitious to RULE. The rulers fought each other to expand their rule. Some ruled with a kind heart, most ruled with a ruthless mind. The latter trampled the basic rights of their subject (remember, humans were always born free?). Subjects of some kingdoms began claiming their long lost rights (a.k.a civil liberties). Most of the times rulers crushed such demands, some of the times the kings were kind enough to grant rights to the citizens, albeit limited by nature or applicability - like the by King James of England in 1215.

After liberties, people also wanted representation in governance. It was demanded that the king consult the people before making laws for the people.

This guy with a funny beard (King Charles I, image from Wikipedia) was perhaps the first king to kind of have a council or a cabinet - that had representative of the public (given the title of Ministers) to advice him on governance matters. This was in England in the 1670s and the world did not evolve at the same pace. When George I, who actually hailed from Hanover, Germany, assumed powers as the King of England in 1714, he found this system of having discussions on administrative issues peculiarly odd and boring. He let the ministers meet and discuss among themselves whatever they felt was important. But somebody had to chair such meetings. This the ministers decided amongst themselves and the chairperson so selected got the title of……The Prime Minister! thus became the first Prime Minister of England. With time, the demand for civil liberties grew wider, representations in the administration grew stronger, cabinet grew powerful and so did the Prime Minister. The king, despite being the head of the state, was merely reduced to a titular head, while the actual powers laid in the hands of the people, represented by the Council / Cabinet of Ministers which in turn is header by the Prime Minister. This came to be know as the Westminster Model of Government.

India upon its independence adopted this model of government. The President is the equivalent of the King of England and is only a de jure leader, while the PM is the de facto leader.

Similar questions