Why does not the bare interaction potential appear in the Bogoliubov theory?
Answers
Answered by
0
and to show you relevant ads and job listings. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and our Terms of Service. Your use of Stack Overflow’s Products and Services, including the Stack Overflow Network, is subject to these policies and terms.
Questions
Tags
Users
Badges
Ask
up vote0down votefavorite
Why does not the bare interaction potential appear in the Bogoliubov theory?
quantum-mechanics quantum-field-theorycondensed-matter renormalization superfluidity
They use some effective potential defined by the s-wave scattering length, but not the bare atom-atom interaction V(r)V(r).
Why?
It is standard practice in second quantization to use the bare interaction and then transform to the momentum space.
share improve this question
askedJul 16 '15 at 13:47

kaiser
504●4●12
What is the "bare" atom-atom interaction? Of course at large distances it will look like V(r)∼1/r6V(r)∼1/r6 for neutral atoms. But what about when rr is comparable to the Bohr radius? – Mark Mitchison Jul 16 '15 at 15:32
It should be a repulsive core. – kaiser Jul 16 '15 at 18:05
1
Until the electron orbitals start to overlap, at which point the scattering problem is a many-electron problem and the concept of an atom-atom potential no longer makes sense. My point is that there does not exist any "bare" potential V(r)V(r), there are only effective potentials valid beyond a certain radius. If you want to use the Lennard-Jones potential, you find that its Fourier transform is divergent as k→∞k→∞, due to the singularity as r→0r→0. But if you don't care about physics at this scale, you replace it with a pseudo-potential whose Fourier transform is simple to work with. – Mark Mitchison Jul 16 '15 at 20:09
add a comment
Questions
Tags
Users
Badges
Ask
up vote0down votefavorite
Why does not the bare interaction potential appear in the Bogoliubov theory?
quantum-mechanics quantum-field-theorycondensed-matter renormalization superfluidity
They use some effective potential defined by the s-wave scattering length, but not the bare atom-atom interaction V(r)V(r).
Why?
It is standard practice in second quantization to use the bare interaction and then transform to the momentum space.
share improve this question
askedJul 16 '15 at 13:47

kaiser
504●4●12
What is the "bare" atom-atom interaction? Of course at large distances it will look like V(r)∼1/r6V(r)∼1/r6 for neutral atoms. But what about when rr is comparable to the Bohr radius? – Mark Mitchison Jul 16 '15 at 15:32
It should be a repulsive core. – kaiser Jul 16 '15 at 18:05
1
Until the electron orbitals start to overlap, at which point the scattering problem is a many-electron problem and the concept of an atom-atom potential no longer makes sense. My point is that there does not exist any "bare" potential V(r)V(r), there are only effective potentials valid beyond a certain radius. If you want to use the Lennard-Jones potential, you find that its Fourier transform is divergent as k→∞k→∞, due to the singularity as r→0r→0. But if you don't care about physics at this scale, you replace it with a pseudo-potential whose Fourier transform is simple to work with. – Mark Mitchison Jul 16 '15 at 20:09
add a comment
Similar questions
English,
7 months ago
Math,
7 months ago
English,
7 months ago
Physics,
1 year ago
CBSE BOARD X,
1 year ago
Math,
1 year ago
Computer Science,
1 year ago