why does the author say, “toto was not the sort of pet we could keep for long"?
Answers
Answered by
24
Answer:
The author said that Toto was not the sort of pet they could keep for long because he was very mischievous and kept destroying things at home.
Explanation:
And best of luck for your 9the session
Answered by
9
Answer:
“Toto was not the sort of pet we could keep for long.” because he was very mischievous. He scratched the plaster of the walls, tore the school blazer and qpnt’s dresses. He threw plates at grandmother and glasses of water at one of the aunt’s face. He used to break the dishes of pulav into pieces. And they could not afford the frequent loss of dishes, clothes, curtains and wallpaper.
i hope it is use full ^_^
Similar questions