Question

why does the author say toto was not the sort of pet we could keep for long ? ​

Answer 1

Answer:

Toto was not the sort of pet we could keep for long.” because he was very mischievous. He scratched the plaster of the walls, tore the school blazer and qpnt's dresses. ... And they could not afford the frequent loss of dishes, clothes, curtains and wallpaper.

Answer 2

Answer:

$\huge\rm\pink{AnSwEr:-}$

Author’s statement about Toto proves itself if we take Toto’s misdeeds into consideration. Nobody could afford the frequent losses. He disturbed all other animals too. Obviously Toto was not the sort of pet we could keep for long.