Question

why does the Missouri compromise seem destined to fail given everything we have learned about westward expansion ? pls helpppp

Answer 1

Answer:

The Missouri Compromise was ineffective in dealing with the issue of slavery because it increased sectionalism between Northern and Southern states. ... Without an equal balance between slave states and free states, Southern states believed they would lose political power in Congress, especially the Senate.

details:

Politicians were forced to deal with the issue of slavery and its westward expansion as early as the Missouri Compromise of 1820. ... Henry Clay of Kentucky temporarily solved the issue by crafting the Missouri Compromise, bringing Missouri into the Union as a Slave State and, as a balance, Maine entered as a Free State.

Missouri Compromise, (1820), in U.S. history, measure worked out between the North and the South and passed by the U.S. Congress that allowed for admission of Missouri as the 24th state (1821). It marked the beginning of the prolonged sectional conflict over the extension of slavery that led to the American Civil War.

In 1818, the Territory of Missouri applied to Congress for admission as a slave state. ... The Compromise also dictated that slavery would be prohibited in all future western states carved out of the Louisiana Territory that were higher in latitude than the northern border of Arkansas Territory.

First, Missouri would be admitted to the union as a slave state, but would be balanced by the admission of Maine, a free state, that had long wanted to be separated from Massachusetts. Second, slavery was to be excluded from all new states in the Louisiana Purchase north of the southern boundary of Missouri.

mark as brainiest :)