History, asked by Shagufta15, 1 year ago

Why hadn't the British annexed all its subsidiary alliance provinces like it had annexed Awadh?

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
1
The subsidiary alliance, in South Asian historyto describe an alliance between princely states and the British East India Company.

It was framed by Lord Wellesley, British Governor-General in India from 1798 to 1805. Early in his governorship, Wellesley adopted a policy of non-intervention in the princely states, but he later adopted the policy of forming subsidiary alliances, which played a major role in the expansion of British rule in India.

In a subsidiary alliance, princely rulers were not allowed to have an independent armed force. They were to be protected by the East India Company but had to pay for the subsidiary forces that the company was to maintain for protection. If Indian rulers failed to make the payment, part of their territory was taken away as penalty. For example, the Nawab (ruler) of Awadh was forced to give over half of his territory to the company in 1801, reason provided by British officer was Maladministration. Hyderabad was also forced to cede territories on similar grounds.

By the late 18th century, the power of the Maratha Empire had weakened and the Indian Subcontinent was left with a great number of states, most small and weak. Many rulers accepted the offer of protection by Wellesley, as it gave them security against attack by their neighbours.


Shagufta15: So , can we say that by keeping the states in alliance they gained profit ?
Shagufta15: Thanks a lot for the answer . It is really helpful.
Similar questions