History, asked by wwivacademy381, 1 year ago

Why handloom weaving did not completely die in india?

Answers

Answered by Priatouri
133

For the following reasons the hand-loom weaving in India did not die completely:

1. The British manufactured goods could not produce clothes with elaborate borders and traditional spun patterns.

2. The Saris with elaborate borders had a wide demand not only among the wealthy but more among the middle sections of the society.

3. The manufacturing machines of Britain did not produce granular cloths used by the lower sections of the Indian society.

Answered by dinesh7387
16

Answer:

Handloom weaving did not completely die in India.

i. This was because some types of cloths could not be supplied by machines. For example, machines could not produce saris with intricate borders or cloths with traditional woven patterns. These had a wide demand not only amongst the rich but also amongst the middle classes.

ii. Nor did the textile manufacturers in Britain produce the very coarse cloths used by the poor people in India.

iii. Sholapur in western India and Madura in South India emerged as important new centres of weaving in the late nineteenth century.

iv. Later, during the national movement, Mahatma Gandhi urged people to boycott imported textiles and use hand-spun and handwoven cloth. Khadi gradually became a symbol of nationalism.

Handloom weaving did not completely die in India in spite of the availability of cheap British-made goods because machines were not able to produce cloth with intricate borders and traditional woven patterns.

pls like

Similar questions