Question

why historians refue to claim that British introduced rule of law​

Answer 1

Answer:

CBSEICSEJEENEETPRICING

Request a call back

User profile image

Login /

Sign Up

Home

Class 1 to 12

JEE

NEET

Foundation

Doubt and Solutions

Textbook Solutions

Board Papers

Sample Papers

Pricing

Diagnostic Test

B2B Partners

Franchisee

Topper TV

Topperlearning

CBSE Class 8 - Ask The Expert

Answered

State two reasons why historians refute the claim that the British introduce the rule of India?

Asked by aarnamahensaria | 24th Sep, 2019, 03:54: PM

Expert Answer:

Historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India because colonial law was arbitrary, and the Historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India because colonial law was arbitrary, and the Indian nationalists played a prominent role in the development of the legal sphere in British India. ... Domestic violence against women was very common in India in the early 1990s. Moreover, the laws for Europeans and Indians were different. The british were often not punished for the crimes committed against Indians.

Answer 2

Answer:

Historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India because colonial law was arbitrary, and the Historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India because colonial law was arbitrary, and the Indian nationalists played a prominent role in the development .