Why Indian constitution is being criticised ?
Answers
Explanation:
The Constitution of India has served a country of subcontinental size like India for more than seven decades. It is so far the most resilient and adapting law of the land. It has shown its resilience and stood the trials and tribulations during the past decades. Many analysts and constitutional pundits have gone to the extent of describing the Constitution of India as the most successful one among all the surviving constitutions of the present world. However, it is sometimes criticized on the following ground.
- Being the lengthiest and bulkiest constitution,
- Termed as ‘lawyers’ paradise’ for containing cumbersome legal terms and words found in the lexicon of law which are beyond the understanding of common citizens,
- Most part of it can be amended with a simple majority conferring unbridled powers to the Union Parliament for such amendments,
- States of the Union of India are deprived of any role in the amending the Constitution,
- Often termed as the ‘bag of borrowed provisions’.
Contains more unitary provisions than federal ones,
- Failed to fulfill the hopes and aspirations of the people of India in giving them a just governance system
However, it is not the constitution that has failed, it is ‘WE THE PEOPLE’ have failed the Constitution. The period of making the constitution and contributions of erudite and experienced individuals to the Constitution vouch for its longevity and success. The political ambience in India is mostly populated by power-mongering and selfish political leaders which is accountable for poor governance in the country and the Constitution is blamed sometimes by some opinion-makers for such precarious situation.
pls mark as brainliest
Answer:
The Constitution of India has served a country of subcontinental size like India for more than seven decades. It is so far the most resilient and adapting law of the land. It has shown its resilience and stood the trials and tribulations during the past decades. Many analysts and constitutional pundits have gone to the extent of describing the Constitution of India as the most successful one among all the surviving constitutions of the present world. However, it is sometimes criticized on the following ground.
Being the lengthiest and bulkiest constitution,
Termed as ‘lawyers’ paradise’ for containing cumbersome legal terms and words found in the lexicon of law which are beyond the understanding of common citizens,
Most part of it can be amended with a simple majority conferring unbridled powers to the Union Parliament for such amendments,
States of the Union of India are deprived of any role in the amending the Constitution,
Often termed as the ‘bag of borrowed provisions’.
Contains more unitary provisions than federal ones,
Failed to fulfill the hopes and aspirations of the people of India in giving them a just governance system
However, it is not the constitution that has failed, it is ‘WE THE PEOPLE’ have failed the Constitution. The period of making the constitution and contributions of erudite and experienced individuals to the Constitution vouch for its longevity and success. The political ambience in India is mostly populated by power-mongering and selfish political leaders which is accountable for poor governance in the country and the Constitution is blamed sometimes by some opinion-makers for such precarious situation.
Explanation: