Geography, asked by KINGOFRANDOM29, 6 months ago

why is it said that income by itself isn't a completely adequate indicator of material goods and services that the citizens are able to use?
PLEASE ANSWER FAST VERY URGENT ​

Answers

Answered by aloksingh17801980
11

Answer:

Income by itself is not a completely adequate indicator of material goods and services that citizens are able to use. ... So, in this case, high income is not important as the person has no feeling of security and freedom.

Answered by sajeenashamnad036
51

Answer:

Income by itself is not a completely adequate indicator of material goods and services that citizens are able to use. Quality of life also depends on non-material things like equal treatment, freedom, security, respect of others, etc.

e.g. a person may be in a job which gives him a high pay, but there is no security in his job and leaves him with no time for family. So, in this case, high income is not important as the person has no feeling of security and freedom.

Explanation:

I hope this is the answer..If it is not, I am so sorry..

Thanks...

  • if it is the answer please mark me as the brainliest..
Similar questions