Why is Parliament form of government chosen in india?
Answers
the founding fathers preferred the British parliamentary system due to the following reasons
Familiarity with the System: The Constitution-makers were somewhat familiar with the parliamentary system as it had been in operation in India during the British rule. So, it was logical to have that system which you are familiar with rather than trying the whole new systemPreference to more responsibility: The Father of our Constitution DR. B R Ambedkar pointed out this in Constituent Assembly that ‘ a democratic executive must satisfy two conditions: stability and responsibility . Unfortunately , it has not been possible so far to devise a system which can ensure both in equal degree. The American system gives more stability but less responsibility. The British system on the other hand, gives more responsibility but less stability . The Draft Constitution in recommending the parliamentary system of executive has preferred more responsibility to more stability..Need to avoid Legislative-Executive Conflicts: The framers of the Constitution wanted to avoid the conflicts between legislature and executive which are bound to occur in the presidential system prevalent in USA. They thought that an infant democracy could not afford to take the risk of a perpetual cleavage, feud or conflict or threatened conflict between these two organs of the government. They wanted to form a government that would be conductive to the manifold development of the country.Nature of Indian Society: India is one of the most heterogeneous States and most complex plural societies in the world. Hence, the Constitution makers adopted the parliamentary system as it offers great scope for giving representation to various sections and regions in the government. This promotes a national spirit among the people and builds a united India.
Whether the parliamentary system should be continued or should be replaced by the presidential system has been a point of discussion and debate in our country since 1970s. This matter was considered in detail by the Swaran Singh Committee appointed by the Congress government in 1975. The Committee opined that the parliamentary system has been doing well and hence, there is no need to replace it by the presidential system.
I HOPE THIS ANSWER HELPS YOU MORE.................!!
@Nishu05 ☺️
the founding fathers preferred the British parliamentary system due to the following reasons
Familiarity with the System: The Constitution-makers were somewhat familiar with the parliamentary system as it had been in operation in India during the British rule. So, it was logical to have that system which you are familiar with rather than trying the whole new systemPreference to more responsibility: The Father of our Constitution DR. B R Ambedkar pointed out this in Constituent Assembly that ‘ a democratic executive must satisfy two conditions: stability and responsibility . Unfortunately , it has not been possible so far to devise a system which can ensure both in equal degree. The American system gives more stability but less responsibility. The British system on the other hand, gives more responsibility but less stability . The Draft Constitution in recommending the parliamentary system of executive has preferred more responsibility to more stability..Need to avoid Legislative-Executive Conflicts: The framers of the Constitution wanted to avoid the conflicts between legislature and executive which are bound to occur in the presidential system prevalent in USA. They thought that an infant democracy could not afford to take the risk of a perpetual cleavage, feud or conflict or threatened conflict between these two organs of the government. They wanted to form a government that would be conductive to the manifold development of the country.Nature of Indian Society: India is one of the most heterogeneous States and most complex plural societies in the world. Hence, the Constitution makers adopted the parliamentary system as it offers great scope for giving representation to various sections and regions in the government. This promotes a national spirit among the people and builds a united India.
Whether the parliamentary system should be continued or should be replaced by the presidential system has been a point of discussion and debate in our country since 1970s. This matter was considered in detail by the Swaran Singh Committee appointed by the Congress government in 1975. The Committee opined that the parliamentary system has been doing well and hence, there is no need to replace it by the presidential system.