why nuclear fusion is dangerous
Answers
Answered by
1
nuclear fusion of two or more nuclei come close and one difference atom
Answered by
0
Fusion research was intentionally funded by the military to help test fusion bomb tech. So all research on fusion is being used by the military to design better fusion bombs.
Fusion reactors are going to be at least 10 times the cost of fission reactors and yet they haven't even produce a commercial power plant. We are 20 years minimum to a first prototype commercial reactor if the ITER project works as planned.
The first wall inside the reactor will become intensely radioactive, and will be high level waste that will have to be stored for 100,000 to a million years. Solar and wind don’t have that problem.
It will leak massive amount of tritium compared to any other source including fission reactors. Hydrogen is very hard to contain.
It will destroy our lithium. The lithium we need for batteries.
It will waste billion of dollar better spent on renewable.
Giant central power plants make the gird unstable, because when they fail it’s nearly impossible to back them up in time. They will need 100% reserve generator coverage for the largest power plant on the local grid.
The plasma is so hard to control that it will almost certainly be inflexible baseload that can only run are a very narrow output range. We need flexible power, not baseload.
Hope it helps. Pls mark me as brainliest.
Fusion reactors are going to be at least 10 times the cost of fission reactors and yet they haven't even produce a commercial power plant. We are 20 years minimum to a first prototype commercial reactor if the ITER project works as planned.
The first wall inside the reactor will become intensely radioactive, and will be high level waste that will have to be stored for 100,000 to a million years. Solar and wind don’t have that problem.
It will leak massive amount of tritium compared to any other source including fission reactors. Hydrogen is very hard to contain.
It will destroy our lithium. The lithium we need for batteries.
It will waste billion of dollar better spent on renewable.
Giant central power plants make the gird unstable, because when they fail it’s nearly impossible to back them up in time. They will need 100% reserve generator coverage for the largest power plant on the local grid.
The plasma is so hard to control that it will almost certainly be inflexible baseload that can only run are a very narrow output range. We need flexible power, not baseload.
Hope it helps. Pls mark me as brainliest.
Anonymous:
pls mark me as brainliest
ya
Similar questions