Question

why only per capita income shouldn't be considered as only criteria of developed country... justify this statement through 3 example​

Answer 1

Answer:

1. Comparisons of per capita income over time need to consider inflation. Without adjusting for inflation, figures tend to overstate the effects of economic growth.

2.International comparisons can be distorted by cost of living differences not reflected in exchange rates. Where the objective is to compare living standards between countries, adjusting for differences in purchasing power parity will more accurately reflect what people are actually able to buy with their money.

3. It is a mean value and does not reflect income distribution. If a country's income distribution is skewed, a small wealthy class can increase per capita income substantially while the majority of the population has no change in income. In this respect, median income is more useful when measuring of prosperity than per capita income, as it is less influenced by outliers.

Answer 2

Explanation:

Per Capita Income is not an adequate indicator of economic development for the following reasons : It is an average amount of the total income which means it can't show the actual income status of a country. ... It needs other criterion to judge the economic development like literacy rate