Social Sciences, asked by bhaskarachary598, 11 days ago

why our india is not unified ? ​

Answers

Answered by madhurane78
0

Answer:

India was under a unified state before colonialism. When the English first setup their company, this is how India looked. Most of present day India was under the empire.

Then that empire began splitting up in 1710s for various reasons (including the fact that the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb ruled way too long leaving his successors without any real experience and also the rebellions he caused by being hard on non-Muslims).

By the middle of the 18th century, the successor of Mughals, the Marathas were consolidating India.

Why did India form a unified country and not split into kingdoms like it was before colonialism?

India was under a unified state before colonialism. When the English first setup their company, this is how India looked. Most of present day India was under the empire.

Then that empire began splitting up in 1710s for various reasons (including the fact that the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb ruled way too long leaving his successors without any real experience and also the rebellions he caused by being hard on non-Muslims).

By the middle of the 18th century, the successor of Mughals, the Marathas were consolidating India.

It is in this transition, that the Europeans played key politics. They pitted one side against another and helped splinter a lot of smaller kingdoms. And a key event occurred in 1761 — Third Battle of Panipat — when the Marathas overextended themselves and got defeated by an alliance of Afghans. The empire collapsed in chaos, allowing the Europeans to pick up the pieces rule for almost 2 centuries.

Unlike in other colonies, the English got a much easier time ruling a larger territory as they were just using the underlying system left by the Mughals. They didn’t unify as much as replace the top. As Indians were going through a civil war it was easier for them to temporarily accept the outsiders. For a few decades they got under the East India Company before the company rule was thrown out in 1857. Then the British crown took over and lasted a few more decades before shown the door in 1947.

During this brief period of British rule, the social system that managed the daily lives were left intact, as is the local governance (Zamindari), the currency (rupee) etc. — .

Given that the colonial rule was brief, India didn’t change too much. The languages we speak, the currency we use (Sher Shah & The Indian Rupee), the daily dishes we make at home (idly, sambhar, roti, biriyani), the religions, social systems all predate the British. Two things that came with the British rule — English and Cricket — are more at the superficial level. Most of the world even not under the British learned English and it was easier for Indians as that is an Indo-European language too. Regarding cricket, it is quite closer the ancient Indian sport of Gillidanda.

That third part was changed was the tax system that the British badly managed.This is why you see most of Indian colonial protests were against the taxes (such as Gandhi’s famous Dandi march). India is fairly unique among the colonies and continued its pre-colonial system as it had a well established state before the Europeans arrived.

Answered by sobbnaaj
1

Explanation:

Yes India is really a unified country. You find people from different religion and class in India. But the fact that they all live the same lifestyle is what unifies them. Before becoming a British empire India already was a nation where common people lived together in unity. Only the rulers of different dynasties created the difference….for example Aurangzeb. But the people are now well aware of the need of unity to develop India. Under the guidance of our honorable PM Narendra Modi, the muslims as well as the hindus of India have learnt about the importance of unity. May God Give the strength to this developing Nation to lead the path of National tolerence and unity.

Similar questions