Math, asked by sejal3729, 10 months ago

Why rural sector is better than urban sector ?​

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
1

Step-by-step explanation:

There is quantitative evidence that rural areas are better off than urban areas on a number of different measures, such as unemployment and crime, but there are substantial differences within both rural and urban areas. In a few respects rural areas are worse off

Answered by Anonymous
10
In India, a region is considered to be a village or a rural area when the population density per square kilometre is 400, it has clear demarcated boundaries without a municipal board, and 75% of the working population is engaged in agriculture, or any of the cottage industries, fishing or pottery for a livelihood. In India approximately 72% of the population lives in the rural area, in approximately 50,000 villages.

Urban area in India, constituting cities and satellite cities, includes any region with a very high population density of more than 400 persons per square kilometre.  It differs from a rural area in terms of infrastructure of built environment.  It has more than 75% of its population engaged in non-agricultural activities. The 2011 census projects an accelerated urbanisation with more people migrating into urban areas in search of employment as well as education.


There are approximately 50,000 villages in India. Far from the hustle and hustle of the cities, villages do have a charm of their own. In most of the villages, the view is scenic and the atmosphere tranquil. The air is pollution free and the environment peaceful. However, living in a village is full of trials and tribulations.

Mostly everything done in villages is manual. Life is difficult and labour intensive.

Most of the villages in India are very remote with some being literally inaccessible due to their locations on high altitudes.

Life in a village is indeed very basic and the conditions primitive, with no infrastructure for water or electricity

Similar questions