why the philosophers against French absolution and fiscal policies
Answers
Answer -
HOPE IT WILL HELP YOU ☺☺
Ideas of having a society based on freedom and equal laws and opportunities for all were put forward by the French philosophers.
John Locke: Locke wrote, ‘Two Treatises of Government’. In this book, he criticised the divine and absolute rights of the rulers.
John .
Jacques Rousseau: Rousseau had written his viewpoints in his book, ‘The Social
Contract’. He had put forward the idea of formation of a government based on a social contract between people and their representatives.
Montesquieu: His ideas were proposed in his book, ‘The Spirit of the Laws’. According to him, there should be a division of power between the three important organs—the legislature, the executive and the judiciary.
The ideas of these philosophers were discussed by common people in salons and coffee houses and inspired them to fight for their rights.
The philosophers against French absolution and fiscal policies
- The French philosophers proposed the idea of a society built on freedom, fair laws, and opportunities for all people. J. M. Locke Two Treatises of Government is a work by Locke. He criticized the kings' omnipotent and unassailable rights in this book.
- The French Revolution benefited greatly from the contributions of the philosophers. They primed the French populace to confront injustice by inspiring them with their revolutionary principles. They included Diderot, Montesquieu, Rousseau, and Voltaire. People were inspired to fight for their rights by their radical views.
- Voltaire, Jean Jacques Rousseau, and Montesquieu were three well-known philosophers in France around the time of the French Revolution.
- The philosophers held that the spread of knowledge would inspire change in every sphere of society, from the grain trade to the criminal justice system. Intellectual freedom—the ability to apply one's own reason and to disclose the results—was foremost among their desired reforms.
#SPJ2