Question

Why there is less number of taxonomist and people are less interested in taxonomy?​

Answer 1

Answer:

because i said them not to choose taxanomi

Explanation:

hope it help

Answer 2

It is not that Taxonomy lacks clear parameters, but more a factor of the ascendance of phylogenetic systematics, which argues that it is more accurate from an evolutionary perspective. This argued because taxonomy does not provide specific sequences of which species evolved in which order, but often shows all the species within a genus (or any other combination of taxonomic levels you choose) as if they arose simultaneously, because taxonomy does not assume a temporal, sequential component.
In contrast the cladistic approach, which underpins phylogenetic systematics is set up so that at each branching event, a new "species" appears. Some even argue that both results of a dichotomous branching event represent new forms or "species". By using ancestral (shared) and derived traits systematics assumes that it can determine which form is the ancestor, and which the descendant. This allows us to assign evolutionary sequences within groups of species. Systematics tends not to use terms like genus, and it seriously avoids using terms like family, order, and class.
With Systematics being ascendant in many journals and departments, taxonomy has sort have become the respected elder whom no one really needs to listen to any more, because they cannot employ the latest jargon fluently.
HOPE IT HELPS