why total disarmament is impossible
Answers
Answered by
5
CQ Researcher
Login
Browse Topics
Agriculture
Arts, Culture and Sports
Business and Economics
Defense and National Security
Education
Employment and Labor
Energy
Environment, Climate and Natural Resources
Government Budget and Taxes
Government Functions
Health
Housing and Development
Human Rights
International Relations
International Trade and Development
Law and Justice
Media
Personal and Family Relations
Religion
Science and Technology
Social Movements
Social Services and Disabilities
Transportation
U.S. Congress
U.S. Presidency
U.S. Supreme Court and Judicial System
War and Conflict
Browse Reports
Browse reports by date
Browse Issue Trackers for all related reports
Browse Pro/Con sections by topic
Using CQR
Log in to your profile
Favorite Documents
Saved Searches
Document History
Topic Alerts
How to Cite
Help
Librarian Account
About
About
What's New
Take a Tour
Permissions
Help
Struggle for Disarmament
By William B. Dickinson Jr.
February 25, 1960
Sections
A document from the CQ Researcher archives:
Report Outline
Renewal of General Disarmament Talks
Geneva Conference on Nuclear Test Ban
Particular Problems in Disarmament
Renewal of General Disarmament Talks
New Attempt to Stop East-West Arms Race
Afresh start on the wearisome and so far unproductive task of forging a comprehensive international agreement on arms limitation is about to get under way at Geneva. An independently established group of 10 nations, evenly divided between West and East,1 will take up on March 15 the job that a subcommittee of the United Nations Disarmament Commission laid down in 1957 in the face of persisting deadlock.2 Progress made after two months, and problems still unsolved both at the new general disarmament conference and at the separate nuclear test ban conference at Geneva, will doubtless come up for review at the Big Four summit meeting opening in Paris on May 16. Disarmament thus is due to receive in the spring of 1960 consideration commensurate with the urgency now
Login
Browse Topics
Agriculture
Arts, Culture and Sports
Business and Economics
Defense and National Security
Education
Employment and Labor
Energy
Environment, Climate and Natural Resources
Government Budget and Taxes
Government Functions
Health
Housing and Development
Human Rights
International Relations
International Trade and Development
Law and Justice
Media
Personal and Family Relations
Religion
Science and Technology
Social Movements
Social Services and Disabilities
Transportation
U.S. Congress
U.S. Presidency
U.S. Supreme Court and Judicial System
War and Conflict
Browse Reports
Browse reports by date
Browse Issue Trackers for all related reports
Browse Pro/Con sections by topic
Using CQR
Log in to your profile
Favorite Documents
Saved Searches
Document History
Topic Alerts
How to Cite
Help
Librarian Account
About
About
What's New
Take a Tour
Permissions
Help
Struggle for Disarmament
By William B. Dickinson Jr.
February 25, 1960
Sections
A document from the CQ Researcher archives:
Report Outline
Renewal of General Disarmament Talks
Geneva Conference on Nuclear Test Ban
Particular Problems in Disarmament
Renewal of General Disarmament Talks
New Attempt to Stop East-West Arms Race
Afresh start on the wearisome and so far unproductive task of forging a comprehensive international agreement on arms limitation is about to get under way at Geneva. An independently established group of 10 nations, evenly divided between West and East,1 will take up on March 15 the job that a subcommittee of the United Nations Disarmament Commission laid down in 1957 in the face of persisting deadlock.2 Progress made after two months, and problems still unsolved both at the new general disarmament conference and at the separate nuclear test ban conference at Geneva, will doubtless come up for review at the Big Four summit meeting opening in Paris on May 16. Disarmament thus is due to receive in the spring of 1960 consideration commensurate with the urgency now
Answered by
1
Answer:
Disarmament is the act of reducing, controlling and stopping the usage of , abolishing weapons in a state or nation .
The nature of the weapons used in a country have got both the positive and the negative effects on the development rate in a country.
Explanation:
Reasons why disarmament is possible.
- It is an agreement within the citizens of a country and hence can be reduced or even limited if not abolished.
- The armament of the nation when not controlled can cause war among the people and hence it is a good idea to reduce such effects on such commodities.
- The law of the land is possible to give the guidelines and the nature of the weapons to be handled by any other person in a country making it possible to control it.
- The forces which works for the government to maintain peace and order as well as providing both internal and external security can have the nature controlled or limited altogether.
Similar questions