Question

why was Congress tyranny rule so hated by the muslims ? (7 marks )​

Answer 1

$WITH the passing of the Government of India Act of 1935, the history of Indian nationalism underwent a subtle change. Though not notice able immediately after the introduction of the Act, the provincial elections, held under its provisions in 1937, and the results thereof, made this change more apparent and clear. The Indian National Con gress secured a sweeping victory in five provinces and was in a position to form coalition ministries in two other provinces--a victory which revealed the efficiency and capability of the party so far as the election machine was concerned. It proved its claim of being a 'National Party'. The Muslim-League, on the other hand, did not fare well at all, especi ally in the Muslim majority provinces of the Punjab and Bengal. Although it did better in the non-Muslim provinces, yet that was not enough to enable the League to boast of being the sole representative organization of the Muslims. The success of provincial parties like the Krishak Lok Party in Bengal and the Unionist Party in the Punjab showed that the Muslim electorates still thought in terms of 'provincial' or 'local' considerations, and were not moved so much by all-India issues. What was true of the League was also true of the Congress so far as the Muslims were concerned. The latter, too, was not able to capture Muslim seats in numbers adequate enough to demonstrate its popularity amongst Muslims. The elections clearly revealed that neither the Indian National Congress, nor the Muslim League, could claim to represent the Muslims of India. Immediately after 1937, therefore, the Congress and the Muslim League set before themselves the task of canvassing Muslim support and enlisting Muslims to their camps in larger numbers. The Congress was motivated by its desire and also its claim of being the only representative organization of the masses of India, irrespective of their religion, caste or creed. For the Muslim League, on the other hand, its very existence was at stake for if it could not prove its claim to represent the Muslims of India, then it was likely to be lost in oblivion. The only chance lay in prov ing the validity of its claim of being a third party' in the country,$

.

.

hope it helps you

please follow and mark as brainliest