Social Sciences, asked by studious02, 1 year ago

Why was Hitler criticized ?

Answers

Answered by anvi95
0
Why is Adolf Hitler criticized so much?

Answer

11

Follow

Request

More

9 ANSWERS

Jeremy White, works at Biotechnology Companies

Answered Jul 12, 2014

80 million reasons. That's how many people died in WW2. Started by Hitler. Putting millions of people in ovens to die, gassing them. Killing them...for no reason other than they were different. Doing medical experiments on people, to see how much pain they can take before dying.

This was the Nazi way. A way started and condoned by Hitler. I suggest you google 'Nazi death camps' and look at the images. Or better, if you are ever in New York or Washington go to the Holocaust Museum to get a very close look as to why hitler is criticized so much. I think you owe it to yourself, if you are a person who questions the morality of man, and how both good and bad can be expressed, so that we can learn to help recognize when the bad shows itself, and tell ourselves 'never again'.

Answered by samueljohngurrp2olf7
0
Hi mate...

I hope this may Help you..

Lot of Note... I took same answer from Web...

In a word...GENOCIDE.  Hitler was one of the first modern leaders to enact a program of deliberate genocide on such a massive scale, and he almost succeeded.  Hitler and the Nazis regarded Judaism to be not only a religion, but also a race/ethnicity - one that was genetically inferior, and which could be systematically wiped out in order to permanently remove Jewish "genes" from humanity.  Gypsies and Slavs were also regarded as undesirable "mongrel races," and targeted for extinction.  The mentally retarded and homosexuals were also targeted in the belief that such traits could also be removed from human bloodlines.  

Sure, there were other examples of genocide from earlier history - the U.S. government's attempts to control the American Indian populations in the nineteenth century, or the Armenian Genocide during World War I, for example.  But these earlier efforts were never intended to totally wipe out the targeted populations, only to punish or control them.  However, Hitler's "final solution," especially as laid out at the Wansee Conference (1942), had as its stated purpose the elimination of all the European Jews.  

The Nazis also had access to all sorts of modern equipment, machinery, and weapons that earlier practitioners of genocide did not - machine-guns, death camps, trains, the Autobahn, poisonous chemical delivery systems, etc. - that allowed them to target, arrest, imprison, and kill with speed and efficiency.  The Mongol hordes would have been envious.  

And while Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and others were also responsible for millions of deaths - some from political purges, others from inept policies - their victims were, more often than not, of the same race as the victimizers.  In other words, although Stalin might have killed thousands in an effort to squash political dissent, and may have been responsible for the death of millions because of avoidable famines, he did not have in place a policy of extermination based on racial hatred.  And, starting in the later twentieth century, racial hatred has become something that the world is extremely sensitive to and on guard against, in large part because of the Holocaust.
Similar questions