History, asked by raksha2008, 5 months ago

Why was it extremely different to rule over the Indian subcontinent?

Plz answer ​don't give unnecessary message.​

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
8

answer

THE 7 CONTINENTS MARATHON CLUB

The 7 Continents Marathon Club (TM) recognises athletes who have completed a marathon distance on all 7 continents as defined below.

DEFINITIONS & GUIDELINES

1. A marathon distance is 42.195km (26.2 miles).

2. The seven major continents are Africa, Antarctica, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.

3. A marathon distance in its entirety must be completed on each continent. A marathon which starts on one continent and finishes on another will not be counted. Marathons on treadmills or boats will not be counted. A person running beyond a marathon distance as part of an ultra marathon must complete the advertised ultra marathon distance or be given an official split time for the marathon.

4. Islands located near a continental landmass are considered part of that continent if they are part of its tectonic plate or continental shelf. In this respect, Ireland and Britain are considered part of Europe, Greenland is part of North America (although politically part of Europe), and Japan is part of Asia.

5. There are some islands and island groups that are not considered part of any continent: Hawaii is an example.

Answered by nakshatra95573
7

Answer:

mark as branliest

Explanation:

it is difficult to rule over indian subcontinent because as now India is a diverse country with different languages...

Similar questions