History, asked by Kanishkasharma7721, 1 year ago

Why were council elections not boycotted in madras?

Answers

Answered by Mansi2000
7
a., The council elections were not boycotted in Madras where the Justice party was dominant 
 b. The Justice party which promoted the interests of Non Brahmans did not join the non cooperation movement , nor it boycotted elections.,
c. The party believed  that council elections was  the way of getting power  and promoting interests which only Brahmins had access to.

The first legislative council election to Madras Presidency after the establishment of dyarchical system of government by the Government of India Act, 1919, was held in November 1920. Indian National Congress boycotted the election due to its participation in the Non-cooperation movement. The election occurred during the early stages of non-Brahmin movement and the major issue of the election was anti-Brahminism. Justice party won the election with no significant opposition and A. Subbarayalu Reddiar became the first Chief Minister of the presidency.

Based on the recommendations of the Montague-Chelmsford report, the Government of India Act of 1919 was enacted. The Act enlarged the provincial legislative councils and increased the number of elected members more than nominated members and company officials. It introduced a system of dyarchy in the Provinces. Although this Act brought about representative Government in India, the Governor was empowered with overriding powers. It classified the subjects as belonging to either the Centre or the Provinces. The Governor General could override any law passed by the Provincial councils. It brought about the concept of "Partial Responsible Government" in the provinces. Provincial subjects were divided into two categories - reserved and transferred. Education, Sanitation, Local self-government, Agriculture and Industries were listed as the transferred subjects. Law, Finance, Revenue and Home affairs were the reserved subjects. The provincial council could decide the budget in so far it related to the transferred subjects. Executive machinery dealing with those subjects was placed under the direct control of provincial legislature. However, the provincial legislature and the ministers did not have any control over the reserved subjects, which came under the Governor and his Executive council. introduced for the first time,BICAMERALISM and Direct Elections in the country.Thus Indian legislative councilwas replaced by a bicameral legislature consisting of an Upper House(Council Of State) and a Lower House( Legislative Assembly).

The Madras Legislative Council had a total of 127 members in addition to the ex - official members of the Governor's Executive Council. Out of the 127, 98 were elected from 61 constituencies of the presidency. The constituencies comprised three arbitrary divisions - 1)communal constituencies such as non-Muhammadan urban, non-Muhammadan rural, non-Brahman urban, Mohamaddan urban, Mohamaddan rural, Indian Christian, European and Anglo-Indian 2)special constituencies such as landholders, Universities, planters and trade associations (South India Chamber of Commerce & Nattukottai Nagarathar Association) and 3) territorial constituencies. 28 of the constituencies were reserved for non-Brahmans. 29 members were nominated, out of whom a maximum of 19 would be government officials, 5 would represent the Paraiyar, Pallar, Valluvar, Mala, Madiga, Sakkiliar, Thottiyar, Cheruman and Holeya communities and 1 would represent the "backward tracts". Including the Executive Council members, the total strength of the legislature was 134
Answered by devjain0987
7

Answer:

The council election were not boycotted in Madras due to the following reasons:

(1) The Justice party was dominant.

(2) The Justice party which promoted the interests of Non Brahmans did not join the non cooperation movement.

(3) The party believed  that council elections was  the way of getting power

Similar questions