History, asked by tejalpankhiwala909, 1 year ago

Why were soldiers and merchants unsatisfied by the aristocratic government in Athens

Answers

Answered by Sidyandex
0

Most of the cities were actually aristocratic.

Except for the regions where the tribal organizations prevailed aristocracy actually replaced kinship.

The aristocrats were quite powerful and they derived this power from the blood bonds which were connected to the families.

The power that they possessed were a threat to the new bourgeois class which was on the rise.

Answered by smartbrainz
0

The aristocrats were quite influential and derived the influence from the blood ties with the families. The influence they had was a challenge to the newly growing ruling class..

EXPLANATION:

Many city-states were originally aristocratic; almost everywhere had been replaced by monarchy, with the exception of the tribal areas (Epirus, Macedonia). The Aristocrats controlled the majority of the country, deriving their power from their blood ties. Their high status was essentially threatened with two reasons by the new, rising bourgeois class.

Trade and industry made considerable revenue. The presence, through the Greek conquest (ca. 8th–6th centuries B.C.), of Greek city states across the Mediterranean Sea encouraged and made transactions more cost effective. Eventually, bourgeois members of the new class outperformed the majority of aristocrats in wealth, but they stayed out of power and authority on the highest level. This however did not  last a long time. Social classes who gained wealth and social prominence will essentially seek political power too. It is a ubiquitous phenomenon.

Until an ancient period, war is primarily an aristocratic affair; wealthy landowners fight for personal supremacy by horseback, whereas the lowest social classes only engage in the Iliad as the light-armed auxiliary. Aristocrats could therefore claim to be protectors of their city-state and then the ones that merit political power. The formation of phalanxes worked totally differently; men of any height, together with their fellow citizens, were battling on foot, in dirt and mud. Phalanxes smashed city state armies that were not adapting enough quickly, and that became extremely popular with the new formation. As one can understand clearly, cities no longer needed the aristocrats, they could no longer claim to be younger.

A social unrest occurred when the bourgeoisie assumed political power. The aristocrats could still interpret laws that had not yet been written. The dispute thus went into the legal field before lawyers such as Solon generally decided to codify the rules. It replaced the aristocrats and the city-states that followed it road to oligarchy, not aristocracies.

To know more

Why were soldiers and merchants unsatisfied by the aristocratic government in Athens

https://brainly.in/question/8780410

Explain the role of aristocracy​

https://brainly.in/question/10171182

Similar questions