why were the representatives of the third estate disappointed with the pattern of voting in the 'ESTATES GENERAL'?
Answers
Answered by
420
In the Estate General, each estate had only one vote.
Even though the third estate had more people than the first two estates combined, they had only one vote.
Every law was passed against them as the first two estates were against giving the third estate any rights
Thus, the representatives of the third estate were disappointed with the pattern of voting in the Estate General.
Please mark brainliest if it helped you :)
Even though the third estate had more people than the first two estates combined, they had only one vote.
Every law was passed against them as the first two estates were against giving the third estate any rights
Thus, the representatives of the third estate were disappointed with the pattern of voting in the Estate General.
Please mark brainliest if it helped you :)
Answered by
142
the representatives of the third estate were disappointed with the pattern of voting in the 'ESTATES GENERAL' because the vote value of each of the estate was counted as 1. When the king(Louis XVI) announced the law the first and second estate always voted in favour of the king because they were getting many liberties and priviliges by the king. But the third estate were always against it. The voting ratio became 2:1. So the majority of votes were in the favour of the king. So the law clearly passed.
Similar questions