Question

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?

Answer 1

Reason for a reseacher using secondary resource instead of primary resource:

Primary source is the original source of any historical event. The primary source is the source that has been originally recorded by someone and therefore gives first-hand account of the historical event.

A researcher would use the primary source of data to know exactly how the event took place. A secondary source is based on the historical event and records the historical events based on the event usage. Primary sources enable the researchers to critically analyse and study the historical event.

Answer 2

Explanation:

• The primary source of any historical case is the initial source. The primary source is the source that someone initially recorded and thus provides the historical event first-hand account.

• The primary source of information would be used by a scientist to understand precisely how the incident took place.

• A secondary source is based on the historical case, recording historical incidents based on the utilization of the case.

• Primary sources allow the scientists to analyze the historical event critically and to study it.