WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST
Why is partitioning a directed line segment into a ratio of 1:3, not the same as finding the length of the directed line segment?
The ratio given is part to whole, but fractions compare part to part.
The ratio given is part of the part. The total number of parts in the whole is 3 – 1 = 2.
The ratio given is part of the part. The total number of parts in the whole is 1 + 3 = 4.
The ratio given is part to whole, but the associated fraction is.
Answers
Why is partitioning a directed line segment into a ratio of 1:3, not the same as finding the length of the directed line segment?
The ratio given is part to whole, but fractions compare part to part.
The ratio given is part of the part. The total number of parts in the whole is 3 – 1 = 2.
The ratio given is part of the part. The total number of parts in the whole is 1 + 3 = 4.
The ratio given is part to whole, but the associated fraction is
Step-by-step explanation:
The length of the directed line segment is partitioned into the ratio of 1:3 is not similar as the one third length of the directed line segment.
The ratio is the quantitative relation between the two different things.
the directed line segment is partitioned in the ratio of 1:3
The directed line segment is partitioned in the ratio of 1:3 .
The first part is prior to the desired point and 3 parts are after the desired point.
Therefore there are total 4 shares as it contains four pieces.
The one third length of the directed line segment means there are three shares of equal size.
Step 3:
We can take an hypothetical length of the cloth as 12 cm.
Now we divide the cloth into the ratio of 1:3 .
1/4 * 12 = 3 (first part)
3/4 * 12 = 9 (second part)
therefore, the cloth is divided in the ratio of 1:3 as 3cm and 9cm .
Now divide the cloth equally in three parts that is of the cloth.
1/3 * 12
∴, the cloth is divided into one third as
Thus, it we have proven it above
For similar questions check out https://brainly.com/question/11764811