With regard to the nurture-nature, continuity-discontinuity and change-stability controversies, the wiser stand is, why?
Answers
Answer:
because government not take any document of days
Answer:
Two of the more highly debated issues in life‐span development psychology today are continuity versus discontinuity and nature versus nurture.
Explanation:
Continuity would be ensured if intelligent people made decisions. For example. If you make a law, explain why you made that law, so that people aren’t faced with illogical and irrational rules that they have to follow. If you want intelligence to continue, you would do everything you could to not corrupt information. Whatever science you discover, treat it as the most valuable thing in the Universe. If you corrupt that information, you corrupt existence. Knowledge is key here.
Discontinuity. I would say apply it when you notice that something is a discomfort. Discontinue discomfort and you may continue comfort. Life is very simple. People make it complicated because they’re not that intelligent and they try to fit the world in their view, so they create abstracts. Everyone discontinues everyone else’s reality because they have egos, and egos are signs of intelligence that are misused.
Change is pretty much like discontinuity. People don’t like change then they’re comfortable. Change has to be introduced slowly over a long period of time. Imagine if we decided to have pride marches during The Inquisition. It took a long time for a chance to show itself as non-threatening to the society it was trying to change. You can push for change, but remember that people don’t like discomfort. Prove it to them that it won’t harm them and they will accept your change. Pride shouldn’t hurt, but the conservatives of this country have a rule against being proudly related to Christianity’s deadly sins, so for them, it’s an insult. Even a frog dies in boiling water if you change the heat increase very slowly.