Question

would it not be better if animals are set free in the forest ?​

Answer 1

$\huge\mathcal{\fcolorbox{cyan}{black}{\pink{answer ࿐}}}$

If there are no animals in forests, then there will be a lack of Carbon Dioxide which is required by Plants for Photosynthesis. If plants wont be able to do photosynthesis to get food,then they will die, resulting in lack of oxygen in that place, and slowly the Humans and Animals would finish due to the lack of oxygen.

Answer 2

S it would be better