Write a brief sketch of M.N.srinivas.
If u r online then answer. ...
Answers
Answer:
M.N.Sʀɪɴɪᴠᴀs Bɪᴏɢʀᴀᴘʜʏ ᴀɴᴅ Cᴏɴᴛʀɪʙᴜᴛɪᴏɴ ᴛᴏ Iɴᴅɪᴀɴ Sᴏᴄɪᴏʟᴏɢʏ
M.N Srinivas full name Mysore Narasimhachar Srinivas. He was born in 1916 in Mysore and passed away in 1999 in Bangalore. He was one of the best Indian sociologists. He was a Brahmin. His studies are prominent in the area of caste and its other classifications, Sanskritization and many other topics that revolve around caste itself.
He acquired his knowledge and doctorate in sociology in the University of Bombay. In the late forties, Srinivas went to the University of Oxford for his further studies. There he played a significant role and started bringing up ideas for sociology.
Methodology:
Srinivas’s perspective was different from another sociologist as he did not want to rely on a western textbook to study his own country people. So, therefore, he himself participated and started with observation and fieldwork. Somewhere in 1940-42, He did a vast field work on Coorgs. He further talks about the unity and interaction among different castes present in Coorgs. Caste he covered was Brahmins, Kaniyas, Bannas and Panikas. He also discusses in villages we can see many independent castes.
Most of the years Srinivas only concentrated on studying caste and religion. He covered all the dimensions of the caste and religion prevailing in the society. He came up with the terms dominant castes, westernization, secularization and sanskritization. This all was the impact and outcome of the caste system.
Srinivas being from Brahmin caste which was believed to be superior he never hesitated to choose caste system as his main area of interest. He presented number studies on how caste has its role everywhere be it be village or cities.
To make people understand the concept of society he categorized these concepts into two
(i) book view (ii) field view
Now when we talk about the book view. Srinivas always said what is given in the book might be good as a reference but completely believing it won’t be useful. He gave more importance to the field perspective. According to books all the caste elements, religion, kinship, geographical areas formulate Indian society’s foundation.
Srinivas always believed to know Indian society and its different aspects one has to go in the field use his own mind and observation and share what he or she has experienced. He said to study Indian society starts with visiting different regions. Study that region and its functions. This is how you can know the nativity of those regions of Indian society.
He also emphasized the importance of mathematical and statistical studies. Many rely on practical analyzes rather on mathematical as it seems to be difficult to follow. He stuck to the notion of local bounded sites which were best seen his paper on the topic like dominant caste and joint family conflicts which he himself observed in rural south India. His uniques style of researching and best works were provided by him due to his unique sense of methodology. Many of his writing served as a reference to many other sociologists or researchers who were also determined to study caste in India.
Recognition:
He was awarded and honored by different institutions. The University of Bombay, the government of France and Royal anthropological institute placed several awards on his hand. President of India awarded him Padma Bhushan. He was also seen as one of the foreigner members in the British Academy and American Academy of Arts and Science.
Writing and inspiration:
Srinivas was greatly influenced by Radcliffe Brown an English social Anthropologist and by his idea of structure. Radcliffe was also his teacher when he was studying at Oxford.
Srinivas was firmly determined to study religion, caste, and social changes. He studied every aspect of Indian society and its relationship with one another. Let it be different tribes, castes, peasants, and sections etc. His writing is of great effort and done in the field in South India.
Answer:
hope it's helpful for you plz mark me brain list
