Write a five-hundred word report, detailing the specific problems that developed as a result of the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation.
You may choose to conduct additional research to build your understanding of the details of each of the problems. If you do choose to use research information, your sources should be cited appropriately.
Answers
Answer:
The states didn't act instantly. It took until February 1779 for 12 states to support the records. Maryland held out until March 1781, after it settled a land battle with Virginia.
The focal government was intended to be, extremely weak. The Articles set up "the United States of America" as a never-ending association shaped to protect the states as a gathering, however, it gave a couple of focal powers past that. However, it didn't have an official or legal branch.
The Articles Congress just had one chamber and each state had one vote. This boosted the intensity of the states to work freely from the focal government, despite when that wasn't in the country's best advantages.
Congress required 9 of 13 states to pass any laws. Requiring this high majority made it extremely hard to pass any law that would influence each of the 13 states.
The record was for all intents and purposes difficult to review. The Articles required consistent agree to any revision, so every one of the 13 states would need to allow a change. Given the competitions between the states, that standard made the Articles difficult to adjust after the war finished with Britain in 1783.
The focal government couldn't gather charges to finance its activities. The Confederation depended on the intentional efforts of the states to send tax cash to the focal government. Lacking assets, the focal government couldn't keep up a persuasive military or back its own paper cash.
States could lead their very own remote approaches. In fact, that job fell to the focal government, however the Confederation government didn't have the physical capacity to implement that control since it needed household and universal powers and standing.
States had their very own cash structures. There was anything but typical money in the Confederation period. The focal government and the states each had separate cash, which made an exchange between the states, and different nations, to a great extent of trouble.
The Confederation government couldn't help settle Revolutionary War-time responsibilities. The focal government and the states owed large responsibilities to European nations and financial specialists. Without the ability to tax, and with no capacity to make an exchange between the states and different nations working, the United States was in a financial wreckage by 1787.
Shays' resistance – the issue that crosses over into intolerability. An assessment challenge by western Massachusetts ranchers in 1786 and 1787 demonstrated the focal government couldn't put down an interior defiance. It needed to depend on a state local army supported by private Boston agents. With no cash, the focal government couldn't act to secure the "permanent association."
These occasions frightened Founders like George Washington, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton to the point where delegates from five states met at Annapolis, Maryland in September 1786 to examine changing the Articles of Confederation.
The gathering included Madison, Hamilton and John Dickinson, and it suggested that a gathering of each of the 13 states be held the next May in Philadelphia. The Confederation Congress approved and the Constitutional Convention of 1787 successfully finished the time of the Articles of Confederation.
hope it helps
please follow me
Answer:
The Articles of Confederation, ratified March 1, 1781, were the first attempt at organized government in America. The individual states were given too much power, while the power of the central government was very minimal, leading to the near demise of the young country. An anonymous writer in the Norwich Packet proclaimed in 1786, “Each State at present possesses powers so totally independent of the others, that no general system can be adopted. They begin to find that a government with so many heads is a monster in politics” (Humphrey 2003, 109). Rather than working together as a nation for a common cause, states were working against each other. There was no revenue source from the states, and under the Articles of Confederation, there…show more content…
During the eight years under the Articles of Confederation, the national debt continued to grow. The country came up with solutions, but the states ignored them. A correspondent in the Independent Chronicle in 1787 plead, “How long are we to continue on our present in-glorious acquiescence in the shameful resistance that some of the states persist in, against federal and national measures?” (Humphrey 2003, 113). Printer Nathaniel Willis called the young country a “union in crisis” (Humprey 2003, 106). Lack of revenue and no way of forcing states to contribute was one of the major and most noted flaws in the Articles of Confederation (Henretta et al. 2010). A second major flaw in the Articles of Confederation, which tied directly into the first in many ways, was a government of separate states rather than a nation of states with one strong central government. The weak central government could not coordinate the actions of the states. Individual states began to create and enforce their own policies, and the weak nation had no way stop it, even if the policies were damaging. For example, the southern state of Georgia took the handling of their neighbor, Spanish occupied Florida, in to their own hands. Georgia went as far as threats of war, and occupying wherever they pleased in a territory that did not belong to America. Many states chose to ignore the 1783 Treaty of Paris.