English, asked by harshitamishra7, 2 months ago

Write a paragraph in 100-120 words on 'Tolerance -The Need of the Hour'​

Answers

Answered by riakumari2121
3

Explanation:

Tolerance is need of hour and nothing is required in this contemporary world than TOLERANCE. As, Tolerance is to accept the views and actions of other with patience and light behavior.  Stopping himself from reaction on the action of other is real TOLERANCE. Parents observe tolerance by forgiving the mistakes committed by their kids similarly a friend bear the odd habits and things of his beloved friends with patience and tolerance. Friendly nations and societies usually do not react over the actions even deadly by one of his friend. That’s why such actions are named in war as friendly attack or strike.

Tips & Quiz

Tips for Happy Life.

Article on tolerance need of the hour | speech on tolerance a need of hour

 August 1, 2017 Article on tolerance need of the hour | speech on tolerance a need of hour2018-06-11T04:18:14+00:00Articles, English Essay 32 Comments

Article on tolerance need of the hour

“Article on tolerance need of the hour” is written as an essay as well as a “speech on tolerance a need of hour “.

Tolerance is need of hour and nothing is required in this contemporary world than TOLERANCE. As, Tolerance is to accept the views and actions of other with patience and light behavior.  Stopping himself from reaction on the action of other is real TOLERANCE. Parents observe tolerance by forgiving the mistakes committed by their kids similarly a friend bear the odd habits and things of his beloved friends with patience and tolerance. Friendly nations and societies usually do not react over the actions even deadly by one of his friend. That’s why such actions are named in war as friendly attack or strike.

 

 

 

Answered by neeraj559145
2

Answer:

hope it would be helpful for u

Explanation:

However, I am concerned that most students in state schools and undergraduates alike are disinclined to learn English. This is true of the arts stream in our universities. The argument which is still very much alive and kicking that English is the language of the colonizer and hence we do not need to learn it is both idiosyncratic and an outdated populist discourse which reeks of nationalism. What the undergraduates need to realize is that it is only through a good knowledge of the English language that they can hope to get employed in the private sector. Is not the private sector the engine of growth and the biggest employer in the country? Public servants need a good command of English language too. There are members of the public who wish to be served in English. Thirty years ago public servants knew their English. My father was a public servant for most of his life and he certainly knew his English. What has happened now? The argument put forward by some that it is the private sector that needs English and not the public service is in my opinion absolutely hypocritical. For example, I worked in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs from 2001-2005 and was surprised to find some Foreign Service officers whose knowledge of English was very poor or in some cases nonexistent. Most of them had been educated in state schools and had been selected to the Sri Lanka Foreign Service (SLFS) after having sat the entrance examination in Sinhala or in Tamil. Nowadays only a few graduates sit the Foreign Service entrance examination in English and, of them only a handful are selected to the service depending on the grades they obtain. The point I am trying to make is can these young Foreign Service officers; that are proficient only in either Sinhala or Tamil language represent this country effectively when they are posted abroad? I think not. Would it not have been better if they were proficient in English as well? Is English not an international language? I have met quite a few young Indian Foreign Service (IFS) graduates who visited Sri Lanka during my time in the Ministry and they certainly knew their English. We have much to learn from India. India never gave up English after independence but encouraged its people to learn the language and today an estimated 350 million Indians can not only understand but speak and write the language as well. Not surprisingly, India has a thriving English book publishing industry which is the third largest after the USA and Britain. The opposite is true of Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka has to import English books as there is no English book publishing industry within the country. There is no English book publishing industry in the country because the vast majority of people cannot read English. Ask any leading bookshop in Colombo and they will tell you that the only market they have for English books is within Colombo and Kandy City limits.

I hope the present generation of teachers in our schools and the younger more enlightened university lecturers will be able to convince the undergraduates especially in the arts stream that a good knowledge of English language is absolutely essential. From the point of view of the undergraduates, a positive change in attitude towards the English language is also required. So the question I pose to the Ministry of Education, the National Institute of Education, school teachers, university lecturers and whoever else is responsible for education in this country is: Are you really serious about arresting the deteriorating standard of English language in our schools and universities by recruiting suitable people as teachers and giving them quality training? We need quantity and quality in terms of English teachers. Send the teachers to India for training if that is the most practical thing to do. If I was a parent I would be concerned about my son or daughters education in a state school or even a local private school as English language teaching standards are at their lowest right now.

Similar questions