write a paragraph with 150 words about the avarage temparature of four cities from the 1750 to 2000 (50 POINTS for the best ANSWER LETS GOOOO)
Answers
Explanation:
The line graph illustrates, the information of, how the average monthly temperature varies in three different countries namely, Paris, Dubai, and Sydney over a year. Units are measured in temperature in degree Celsius.
Overall, it has been clear from the chart that, Dubai experiencing the highest temperature during July and August and this country was on top temperature among the given countries. While, Paris was the lowest temperature in most of the months though, peak temperature time was n July and august.
Sydney has the highest temperature from January to March which is, approximately 23 degree Celsius, while, the temperature plummet to around 13 degree Celsius in July. Whereas, after July, the trend shows upward and exceeding the temperature of Paris on September and increased to more than 20 degree Celsius by December. Moreover, in December, Sydney experiencing the highest temperature among other given countries.
In January, the temperature of Dubai was below 20 degree Celsius which went up on the following months reached at the peak on August and September with above 35 degree Celsius. Then, there was a slight decline in temperature and dramatically reached to around 21 degree Celsius in December. Similarly, Paris started the temperature with mere 5 degree Celsius and there was a noticeable surge in temperature on consecutive months, then touched to 20 degree Celsius during the month of July and august. Then the figure tumbled to the beginning Celsius with 5 degree.
Answer:
Sustainable development and equity provide a basis for assessing climate policies. Limiting the effects of climate change is
necessary to achieve sustainable development and equity, including poverty eradication. Countries’ past and future contri-
butions to the accumulation of GHGs in the atmosphere are different, and countries also face varying challenges and circum-
stances and have different capacities to address mitigation and adaptation. Mitigation and adaptation raise issues of equity,
justice and fairness. Many of those most vulnerable to climate change have contributed and contribute little to GHG emis-
sions. Delaying mitigation shifts burdens from the present to the future, and insufficient adaptation responses to emerging
impacts are already eroding the basis for sustainable development. Comprehensive strategies in response to climate change
that are consistent with sustainable development take into account the co-benefits, adverse side effects and risks that may
arise from both adaptation and mitigation options. {3.1, 3.5, Box 3.4}
The design of climate policy is influenced by how individuals and organizations perceive risks and uncertainties and take
them into account. Methods of valuation from economic, social and ethical analysis are available to assist decision-making.
These methods can take account of a wide range of possible impacts, including low-probability outcomes with large conse-
quences. But they cannot identify a single best balance between mitigation, adaptation and residual climate impacts. {3.1}
Climate change has the characteristics of a collective action problem at the global scale, because most GHGs accumulate
over time and mix globally, and emissions by any agent (e.g., individual, community, company, country) affect other agents.
Effective mitigation will not be achieved if individual agents advance their own interests independently. Cooperative responses,
including international cooperation, are therefore required to effectively mitigate GHG emissions and address other climate
change issues. The effectiveness of adaptation can be enhanced through complementary actions across levels, including
international cooperation. The evidence suggests that outcomes seen as equitable can lead to more effective cooperation.