Social Sciences, asked by sarmadebasis123, 2 months ago

Write a short note on any two Raiput Kingdom s​

Answers

Answered by akanksha2614
23

Answer:

Rajput, (from Sanskrit raja-putra, “son of a king”), any of about 12 million landowners organized in patrilineal clans and located mainly in central and northern India. They are especially numerous in the historic region of Rajputana (“Land of the Rajputs”) that also included portions of present-day eastern Pakistan.

Answered by Anonymous
0

The term "Rajput" denotes a cluster of castes,[111] clans, and lineages.[112] It is a vaguely-defined term, and there is no universal consensus on which clans make up the Rajput community.[113] In medieval Rajasthan (the historical Rajputana) and its neighbouring areas, the word Rajput came to be restricted to certain specific clans, based on patrilineal descent and intermarriages. On the other hand, the Rajput communities living in the region to the east of Rajasthan had a fluid and inclusive nature. The Rajputs of Rajasthan eventually refused to acknowledge the Rajput identity claimed by their eastern counterparts,[114] such as the Bundelas.[115] The Rajputs claim to be Kshatriyas or descendants of Kshatriyas, but their actual status varies greatly, ranging from princely lineages to common cultivators.[116]

The term "Rajput" denotes a cluster of castes,[111] clans, and lineages.[112] It is a vaguely-defined term, and there is no universal consensus on which clans make up the Rajput community.[113] In medieval Rajasthan (the historical Rajputana) and its neighbouring areas, the word Rajput came to be restricted to certain specific clans, based on patrilineal descent and intermarriages. On the other hand, the Rajput communities living in the region to the east of Rajasthan had a fluid and inclusive nature. The Rajputs of Rajasthan eventually refused to acknowledge the Rajput identity claimed by their eastern counterparts,[114] such as the Bundelas.[115] The Rajputs claim to be Kshatriyas or descendants of Kshatriyas, but their actual status varies greatly, ranging from princely lineages to common cultivators.[116]There are several major subdivisions of Rajputs, known as vansh or vamsha, the step below the super-division jāti[117] These vansh delineate claimed descent from various sources, and the Rajput are generally considered to be divided into three primary vansh:[118] Suryavanshi denotes descent from the solar deity Surya, Chandravanshi (Somavanshi) from the lunar deity Chandra, and Agnivanshi from the fire deity Agni. The Agnivanshi clans include Parmar, Chaulukya (Solanki), Parihar and Chauhan.[119]

The term "Rajput" denotes a cluster of castes,[111] clans, and lineages.[112] It is a vaguely-defined term, and there is no universal consensus on which clans make up the Rajput community.[113] In medieval Rajasthan (the historical Rajputana) and its neighbouring areas, the word Rajput came to be restricted to certain specific clans, based on patrilineal descent and intermarriages. On the other hand, the Rajput communities living in the region to the east of Rajasthan had a fluid and inclusive nature. The Rajputs of Rajasthan eventually refused to acknowledge the Rajput identity claimed by their eastern counterparts,[114] such as the Bundelas.[115] The Rajputs claim to be Kshatriyas or descendants of Kshatriyas, but their actual status varies greatly, ranging from princely lineages to common cultivators.[116]There are several major subdivisions of Rajputs, known as vansh or vamsha, the step below the super-division jāti[117] These vansh delineate claimed descent from various sources, and the Rajput are generally considered to be divided into three primary vansh:[118] Suryavanshi denotes descent from the solar deity Surya, Chandravanshi (Somavanshi) from the lunar deity Chandra, and Agnivanshi from the fire deity Agni. The Agnivanshi clans include Parmar, Chaulukya (Solanki), Parihar and Chauhan.[119]Lesser-noted vansh include Udayvanshi, Rajvanshi,[120] and Rishivanshi[citation needed]. The histories of the various vanshs were later recorded in documents known as vamshāavalīis; André Wink counts these among the "status-legitimizing texts".[

Similar questions