write a story in about 150-200 words on a girl who was good in sports but dull in studies
Answers
She was a total tough person and didn’t give a care bout her studies but one day came along when a new boy entered the school he was also good in studies but not enough to beat her rank. That was not it, he was good in studies too which made her jealous because she was the topic of the talk or the attention consumer and now he was the one. This made her to start studying she wasn’t as good as others but she was doing better than before. The boy and the girl became close frnds and helped each other a lot. She helped him in a few sports and he helped her in studies this way both of them gained smthing.
It isn’t much but still I tried.
Comment if it was useful.
The 25-year study suggests dull, lackluster coverage makes female sports events seem less exciting than men’s – harming everything from women athletes’ salaries to ticket sales.
Researchers found new segments on women’s sport are shorter, include fewer interviews and less entertaining commentary.
And coverage of womens’ sports features matter-of-fact reactions which make female athletes seem less exciting, according to the research.
The team behind the study say the coverage equates to subtle sexism which is difficult to challenge but harms female sports.
Lead author Michela Musto, a doctoral student at the University of Southern California, said: “Sports news shows now disguise sexism in their ‘matter-of-fact’ reactions to women athletes’ performance, subtly sending viewers the message that women’s sports lack the excitement and interest of men’s sports.”
The study, published in the journal Gender and Society journal, was co-authored by Michael Messner, also from the University of Southern California and Cheryl Cook, from Purdue University in Indiana.
Every five years beginning in 1989, they examined six weeks of sports news on three Los Angeles-based network affiliate stations and three weeks of ESPN’s SportsCenter.
The team found women’s sports coverage tended to be overtly sexist from 1989-1999, trivializing by linking women to their conventional roles as mothers, wives and girlfriends from 1999-2009.
But now, based on the most recent data from 2014, coverage depicts women’s sports in a lackluster manner, which the researchers call “gender blind sexism.”
The study revealed women’s sports coverage had less air time, entertaining language, interviews, in-game footage and compliments.
SportsCenter’s segments on men’s sports averaged two minutes and five seconds and stories about men’s sports on the local stations averaging 47 seconds.
But women’s stories averaged one minute and 17 seconds on SportsCenter – nearly 50 percent shorter than men’s sports stories – and 44 seconds on the local affiliates.