Question

Write a Supreme Court opinion that describes your decision for United States v fields. Write three to four paragraphs.

Answer 1

Answer:

In this case, the Court ruled that states must prove that a person had malice when he or she created a false statement. Malice is an intentional decision to cause harm. This case relates to my case because it explains that speech can be restricted for content reasons if malice can be proven.

The court also ruled that Johnson had the right to free speech when he burned his flag. Governments cannot restrict a person's free speech just because the content of what they are saying is offensive or disagreeable. My case is also about the content of a person's speech, and Fields also made an offensive type of statement by lying.

According to a 2012 decision by the US Supreme Court, Abel Fields's actions are protected by the First Amendment. By a 6-3 majority, the Supreme Court determined that the Stolen Valor Act was unconstitutional under the First Amendment's protection of free speech.

Explanation:

i hope this helps

Answer 2

The opinion of the Supreme Court which describes your decision in the United States sector states that is:

• Vision of the Supreme Court of the United States fiction case vs Fields.
• Remember, you are serving as a High Court judge.
• Your opinion should summarize the facts of the case, state your decision, and quote the presentation to support your views.
• Fields appealed the decision to the Ninth Regional Court of Appeal.
• He argued that the Stolen Valor Act was unconstitutional and that his right to freedom of expression had been violated.
• The Ninth Regional Court of Appeal ruled in his favor.

• While under § 6 of the Court of Appeals Act of 1891, 26 Stat. 828, the certiorari can only be issued where the error book will not be, it will not be issued because the error book will not lie.
• But only when the case is serious, when there is a conflict between the decisions of state courts and state courts, or between those of the state courts of different circuits, or something that affects the relations of this nation with foreign nations, or in general public interest.