Write an argument for or against the idea of using controlled fires to protect wild areas. 3 paragraphs, no more, no less. DUE IN ONE HOUR!!!
Answers
Answered by
3
Answer:
This really just depends on your stance. I'm not sure which side you've chosen to write, for or against using controlled fires to protect wild areas. However, the way I'd start is would probably be something like the following.
For -
Controlled fires are an effective way for us to stop wildfires from destroying more land than is necessary. [Explain your stance]
Against -
Controlled fires have a chance to stop a wildfire in it's tracks, however it can backfire and become the very wildfire it was meant to stop. [Explain your stance]
Answered by
0
Answer:
hey so like cool username my name is victoria and i see you have victoria in your username so whats up
Explanation:
Similar questions