write an argumentative essay on the topic:"militry rules is better than sivilian rules.
Answers
There have been many system of government.Military and Civilian government have existed.In this debate, I will tell you that military government is better than civilian government.
One reason I say this is because in the military,discipline is observed than in the civilian government.Food eaten cannot be thrown anywhere this is because you will definitely be beaten by a soldier.People are not expected to keep up late at night and the military will ensure this.The civilian government gives freedom to do things at there own peril.
Another reason I support the motion is that decisions are taken faster in the military system.The civilian government delays decision making and this can affect the country.Laws are made through decree.
Yet another reason is that defense,protection of lives and property is ensure in the military than civilian government.Nobody will threaten the territorial integrity of its state.Unlike the civilian government,they are weak without the military.So,the strong should be allowed to rule instead of the weak.
I do agree on the fact that Military governments would get things done faster, but in the Military there is the chain of command, If one of the higher ranking officials where to become he would be able to order people around, and low ranking people that don't have clearance would be doing things without knowing the side effects. That's the other problem is a Military Government would be too compartmentalized. Only certain people would know certain things. And, if for some reason the government should become corrupt, there would be no way for a civilian to do anything without basically declaring war on the government. And, in my personal opinion, I would want to be subject to Living by military rules my whole entire life. I am a huge fan of staying up late and watching movies and stuff like that. I wouldn't want to have to live my whole entire life for the military's agenda. There is a point to which I would obey a work for the military, but a some point I would want to do my own thing in life and be my own person instead of being subject to military rule.
In the civilian rule,opposition and criticism are tolerated.In the military these are not tolerated because in the bible,people in authority are not to be criticized because God placed them there.People in the civilian government tend to misuse the rigths
With these points of mine,I know beyond all reasonable doubt that I have been able to convince my learned colleague,the doubting Thomases that indeed,military rule is better than civilian rule. Thanks.
Ok, look at how long the nation of Israel went before It's kings became corrupt, there are very few men that can lead a country without doing thing for themselves. I have pasted a URL below. It will take you to a website that says whether that king of Israel/Judah did evil or not. And 1 more thing, Originally, the Nation of Israel was lead by a Judge, who made sure the people stayed moral, he did not control them. Then the people of Israel wanted a man to lead them, A look what happened to them. They went in and out of sin.
"Military Rules Is Better Than Civilian Rules."
- I am saying this because in the military the discipline is more practical than in the civilian government. Food eaten cannot be tossed anywhere this is because one will be beaten by a soldier. People are not anticipated to keep up late at night and the military will assure this. The civilian government gives liberty to do things at their own peril.
- The second reason why I believe the motion is that decisions that are taken are faster in the military system. The civilian government has uncertainties in decision making and this can affect the country. Laws are made through the ruling.
- The third reason is that defence, the safety of lives and property is assured in the military than in civilian government. Nonentity will endanger the territorial virtue of its state. Unlike the civilian government, they are vulnerable without the military. So, the powerful should be allowed to rule instead of the vulnerable.
- The fourth reason is that in civilian rule, resistance and objection are tolerated. In the military, these are not accepted because, in the Bible, people with permission are not to be criticized as God placed them there. People in the civilian government are inclined to misapply their rights.
With these points of mine, I like to conclude that beyond all reasonable doubt that I have been apt to persuade military rule is better than the civilian rule.
#SPJ2