Write an effective and well informed debate in not more than 200 words on the topic: ’Every citizen should be mandated to perform national public service.’
Answers
Answer:
Proposals for the United States to implement mandatory national service, a requirement that people serve in the military or complete other works of service, trace back to the 1800s. [1] Modern propositions for compulsory service envision that young Americans could join the military or do civilian projects such as teaching in low-income areas, helping care for the elderly, maintaining infrastructure, and much more. [2]
Public opinion on mandatory national service is split: 49% favor one year of required service for young Americans, while 45% are opposed. Among adults ages 18 to 29, 39% are for the proposal and 57% are against. [3] Is mandatory national service a path to unity and prosperity in these especially divided times, or an unconstitutional and unjust plan foisted on the nation’s youth by older generations?
Explanation:
Pro 1
Mandatory national service would foster unity and bring people from diverse backgrounds together. The partisan divide in the United States has never been greater: Pew Research tracked an increase in partisan differences from 15 percentage points in 1994 to 36 points in 2017. Dan Glickman, JD, former US congressman from Kansas, believes that mandatory service would be a solution to our "current dysfunction" because "National service, be it in the military, Peace Corps, or other public or private sector opportunities, breaks down the barriers of race, class, income, geography, and even language. Young adults are granted the opportunity to see their peers and fellow Americans as a member of their team."
Around 30 countries have compulsory military service. Switzerland, which has four official languages and three major ethnic groups, bridges its divides with a mandatory national service program. The European nation is identified as one of the happiest countries in the world by the United Nations.
Gene Yaw, JD, state senator in Pennsylvania, recommends a two-year universal public service requirement to promote civility and understanding of what it means to be an American: "We cannot generate enthusiasm for our way of life when less than 2% of our population has put forth any effort for our country."
Con 1
National service doesn't need to be mandatory because the volunteer system is booming. 28% of millennials already do volunteer work, for a total of 1.5 billion community service hours annually. Several voluntary civilian service programs already exist, such as AmeriCorps, Teach for America, and the Peace Corps, in addition to limitless volunteer opportunities throughout the country. Since AmeriCorps was founded in 1993, over 800,000 participants have completed more than one billion service hours. ] Applications already outpace funding and capacity, meaning that forcing more people to participate would be difficult. There are 15 qualified would-be volunteers for every available AmeriCorps spot.
Conscripting people into the military would make the armed forces less efficient. Michael Lind, JD co-founder and fellow at the New America Foundation, stated, "Most members of the military are satisfied with our professional soldiers and do not want to baby-sit teenagers who will leave the military after six months or two years of unsought, compulsory training."
More than 24 million of the 34 million Americans between ages 17 and 24 - a whopping 71% - would be ineligible to serve in the military because of disqualifying factors such as poor health, felony convictions, and tattoos.
hope this helps you
mark as brainlist
Meri taraf se upr answer diya gya h...
hope it helps you